CYBERDUCK VS. DUPLICACY SOFTWARE

CYBERDUCK VS. DUPLICACY SOFTWARE

So if AWS come out with a new feature in S3, it won’t be replicated in Linode (or other S3-compatible service) until the software replicates the API call in their system. I believe the storage software systems (in Linode’s case, Ceph) commit to compatibility with a specific version of AWS’ API. The only difference as far as a client application is concerned is the endpoint (hostname) to which it is talking to. So the URLs/endpoints, parameters, encryption methods and response data are all the same as those used on AWS. If re.match('(?:http|https)://', url) is None:ĭescription Linode Object Storage (and several other S3-compatible services) implement the same API as AWS S3. Print('Product image uploaded in S3: %s ' % Print('Error in file upload %s.' % (str(e))) # Format the return URL of upload file in S3 Bucjet Key=key, Body=data, ContentType='image', ACL='public-read')

# Open the server file as read mode and upload in AWS S3 Bucket. # Write the raw data as byte in new file_name in the server Can anyone share some light on this?įor example, I have the following python function for uploading my assets to s3 in my web app.ĭef upload_file_to_aws_s3(url='', objectid='', file_name=''):Īws_secret_access_key=AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, I've read that Linode Object Storage is compatible with S3, but not sure how compatibility is being made. I am assessing the potential of migrating over to Linode Object storage.

Cyberduck vs. duplicacy